Sales processes are very complex and involve a toolbox of both martech and salestech

The following passage is from Atomic Habits, by James Clear (a book I highly recommend, if you haven't read it), on building new routines and the essence of habits as the compound interest of self-improvement on an individual level.

"๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜š๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ˆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ฐ ๐˜š๐˜ฑ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ด, ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ด๐˜ถ๐˜ค๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ด๐˜ง๐˜ถ๐˜ญ ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฎ๐˜ด ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜•๐˜‰๐˜ˆ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜บ, ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ท๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข ๐˜ฒ๐˜ถ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ ๐˜ง๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ ๐˜ด๐˜ฐ๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜‘๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฃ ๐˜™๐˜ช๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜จ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ช๐˜ณ ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ค๐˜ฌ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ: โ€œ๐˜ž๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฎ๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ฑ, ๐˜ ๐˜จ๐˜ฐ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฌ ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ข ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ต๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ฎ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ข๐˜ธ๐˜ข๐˜บ ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ค๐˜ฌ, ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ฑ๐˜ด ๐˜ข ๐˜ฉ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ธ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ต ๐˜ข๐˜ด ๐˜ฎ๐˜ถ๐˜ค๐˜ฉ ๐˜ข๐˜ด ๐˜ข ๐˜ค๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ฌ ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ช๐˜ต. ๐˜ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ง๐˜ช๐˜ณ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ฃ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ ๐˜ช๐˜ต ๐˜ธ๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ญ ๐˜ด๐˜ฑ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ต ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ต๐˜ธ๐˜ฐ, ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ ๐˜ฌ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ ๐˜ช๐˜ต ๐˜ธ๐˜ข๐˜ด ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ฃ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ ๐˜ช๐˜ตโ€”๐˜ฃ๐˜ถ๐˜ต ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ ๐˜จ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ.โ€"

I find many parallels to the science (or art?) of closing large business deals.

Most Megadeals (B2B) sales processes are very complex and involve a rich toolbox of both martech and salestech tactics from the selling side, used over long periods of time and aimed at a large number of stakeholders, both around, and directly involved in the deal, many of which are informal decision-makers and hard to map out correctly from the outside.

Since the focus usually is not on "getting clicks" but on building awareness (in the human brain), measuring attribution of impact is challenging.

When the deal goes through, was it the repeated exposure of ads in websites such as Forbes.com, Di.se, CNN.com etc that did it? Perhaps the retargeting in social media, the segments & names based targeting in Linkedin etc, the beeswarming (team-synchronized visits of linkedin profiles) or the ad on the digital billboard outside the soon to be client's office? What roles played the consistent posting and thought leadership in social media, and of course the sales meetings, calls and emails?

Well the answer is of course that all of these activities contributed to moving the client through the sales funnel and eventually closing the multimillion (or -Billion) dollar deal.

Certainly, you can and should measure the buying intent in various ways and adapt the messaging accordingly, depending on how the prospect moves in the sales funnel. However, the complex science of attribution of a large number of stakeholders over many months, often years, is not easily quantifiable. A great deal of patience and consistency is needed in this orchestration.

At Megadeals Advisory we find this intersection of art and science at play around the large deals particularly fascinating and rewarding to work with.

//Johan Hultman